VIDEO EVIDENCE

Full disclosure: I do not own the rights to this documentary and I'm in no way trying to claim ownership or receive any type of compensation for this video. This film was directed by Dylan Avery (Loose Change), and produced by Kelly David, Richard Gage, and Ted Walter. All rights belong to those individuals, and whoever else was involved in the filmmaking process.

I'm uploading this in hopes of sharing the information with the rest of the world, people who may not have access to this or were even aware of it's existence, as well as the fundamental problems related to the original 9/11 Commission Report investigation. This was one of the most significant, life changing events of our modern age, fundamentally forever altering our future moving forward into the 21st century. So many lives were affected by this incident, and yet we still have so many unanswered questions.

It may be heartbreaking to revisit these emotional times, this 20th Anniversary of 9/11, but if we're ever to have any closure, if we're ever going to have any sense of justice and honor those we lost that day, we need to ask these hard questions and pursue all efforts for a thorough, unbiased, independent investigation into why these towers collapsed, and hold those who perpetrated it truly accountable for their actions.

I believe knowledge should be free, all documentaries should have widespread public accessibility across the world wide web, and that's why I have chosen to upload this. I'm not sure how long this will stay up, but please enjoy and share while you can. Thank you!

"Directed by Dylan Avery and narrated by Ed Asner, SEVEN tells the story of World Trade Center Building 7 — from its jaw-dropping "collapse" on 9/11 to the government's blatant cover-up to the intrepid study by Dr. Leroy Hulsey and his Ph.D. students at the University of Alaska Fairbanks."

www.ae911truth.org

Available for streaming on Prime Video, Vudu, iTunes, Google Play, Vimeo on Demand, & Microsoft webstore, etc.

Also DVD available for purchase here: (https://www.shop.ae911truth.org/DVD-Cased-SEVEN-SevDoc.htm)

1K 234

This is the original video that YouTube took down, without notice, on or about Feb 20, 2015 - which left the following notice for those who follow one of thousands of locations of the YouTube link out there on the internet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

"This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy against spam, scams, and commercially deceptive content"

Which makes no sense whatsoever given the scientific evidence that this documentary sticks to. Of course we are appealing the action to the extent that we can and will take legal steps as well.
The video had over a Million and a half views prior to be taken down.

Richard Gage, AIA
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org

8.2K 3.5K

On March 25th following a rigorous 4 year study on the collapse of the THIRD tower to collapse on 9/11, University of Alaska researchers concluded it could NOT have fallen due to the official conclusion of 'normal office fires'. Their findings necessitate foreknowledge of the 9/11 event. These findings alone but also in tandem with the vast raft of evidence compiled in the 19 years since 9/11 now amount to and exceed to legal criteria for 'reasonable cause to suspect' 9/11 was a 'false flag terrorist' event. Under both UK and US law it provides lawful reason to withhold your taxes. How many will? How many of you will remain intimidated..?

193 57

Support Firefighters for 9-11 Truth via - www.ff911Truth.org


Firefighters talk about fire physics, building designs and explain why they continue to commit into high-rise fires without fear of sudden and complete building failure. The science of fire behaviour and basic physics is used to show how normal office fires cannot create the same outcome observed in both a controlled demolition or the freefall collapse of World Trade Centre Building-7 on September 1th 2001.

Details include::

A summary of the history of high-rise fires and their impact on the architecture involved
The importance of understanding science rather than relying upon consensus opinion
The science of freefall and how this provides an irrefutable yardstick of truth
The assessment of the rate of descent of WTC7
An analysis of the real fires in WTC7 versus the theoretical fires proposed by NIST
An analysis of the claim that WTC7 was left to burn due to poor firefighting water supplies
A brief exposure of the certain foreknowledge held by NY City officials of the collapse of all three towers
The decision of NIST to ignore the fundamental principle of scientific investigation known as ‘Occam’s Razor’
A summary of NIST’s many omissions, errors and attempts to mislead the public
A summary of the results of Alaska University’s 2019 evaluation of the collapse of WTC7 which identified that fires could NOT have been the cause of the collapse
An appeal for support and justice from New York Fire Commissioner Christopher Gioia

514 9

These are the individual Chapters from the 90 minute version of 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out which is the documentary film by the 2,000 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founded by Richard Gage, AIA in 2007 whose mission is to obtain a real investigation into the destruction of all THREE World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11.

1. Introduction.mp4
2. WTC7 Part 1 - Third High Rise
3. WTC7 Part 2 - Destruction of Evidence
4. WTC7 Part 3 - Investigation That Ignored the Facts
5. WTC7 Part 4 - Fully Engulfed in Fire
6. WTC7 Part 5 - 47 Stories in 7 Seconds
7. WTC7 Part 6 - Unnatural Symmetry
8. WTC7 Part 7 - Virtual Unreality - NIST Animations
9. WTC7 Part 8 - Experts Agree
10. WTC TT - Part 1 - Myth Unravels
11. WTC TT - Part 2 - Sudden Onset of Destruction
12. WTC TT - Part 3 - Constant Acceleration
13. WTC TT - Part 4 - Eyewitness Reports of Explosions
14. WTC TT - Part 5 - Direct Evidence of Explosions
15. Ground Zero - Part 1 - Melted Steel Beams and Molten Iron
16. (((Missing File))) (((Part 2 - Iron Microspheres
17. Ground Zero - Part 3 - High Tech Incendiaries in WTC Dust
18. Ground Zero - Part 4 - Experts Agree
19. Ground Zero - Part 5 - The Next Logical Step
20. Seeking Understanding - Coming to Terms
21. Seeking Understanding - Too Close To Home
22. Conclusion

The full length DVD can be purchased at:

http://shop.ae911truth.org/DVD-Cased-9-11-Explosive-Evidence-Experts-Speak-Out-DVD-ESO-CASED1-PP.htm?sourceCode=ytESOTralr_LrjcXOJIWw0

or get the full length HD file at http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.com

Join 23-year architect Richard Gage, AIA, in this feature length documentary with cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 top experts in their fields -- high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more. Each is highly qualified in his/her respective fields. Several have Ph.D's -- including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis. She, along with the other experts, exposes the fraudulent reports of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied and acknowledges the "overwhelming" evidence of high temperature incendiaries in all dust samples of the WTC.

As millions of people are becoming aware that they haven't gotten the whole story on 9/11, more than 2,000 architects & engineers are leading the way at AE911Truth, with dozens of these professionals giving testimonials in this documentary, putting their careers on the line in their demand for a new independent investigation and calling for a more scientific assessment of the destruction at the World Trade Center.

The sudden, complete collapse of the third skyscraper,WTC Building 7 at 5:20pm on 9/11 at free-fall acceleration, is now being seen around the world as "the smoking gun" which disproves the official story about 9/11. These experts also introduce additional "overwhelming evidence" for a controlled demolition hypothesis of the three World Trade Center highrises - which raises many disturbing questions.

The film does not speculate - but does empathize with viewers by also introducing the professional perspectives of eight psychologists who explain some of the reasons why it is so hard for people to face the scientific evidence. This is the most scientific and compelling 9/11 documentary film to date.

9/11 family members and psychologists round out the professional showing and place the immense implications of the scientific evidence in perspective in this milestone production.

If you are moved with the vital nature of our work we encourage you to make your tax deductible donation (We are a 501c3 non-profit organization) at:

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home/68-contribute-to-ae911truth/420-donate-ae911truth.html

Visit our web sites;
http://www.ae911truth.org
http://rethink911.org
http://911expertsspeakout.com
http://911expertsspeakout.org
http://911blueprintfortruth.org
http://facebook.com/ae911truth
http://www.twitter.com/ae911truth
http://www.youtube.com/ae911truth

55 0

AE911Truth founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, provides an overview of the evidence related to the collapse of WTC 7 on December 16, 2016, at the BSA Space, home of the Boston Society of Architects.

Gage’s hour-long presentation at the BSA Space was AE911Truth’s first-ever in-person continuing education course on the collapse of WTC 7. More than a dozen architects received one learning unit for their participation.

For more information, visit http://AE911Truth.org.

156 94

[This is a reposting of this video which was taken down from the original site, originally posted in August 2008 just after the release of the final draft of the NIST WTC7 Report, prior to the final version which was altered to admit a 2.25 second period of freefall.]
This video tracks the motion of the NW corner of Building 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001. The building was in freefall for a period of ~2.5 seconds. This means it was falling through itself for over 100 feet with zero resistance, an impossibility in any natural scenario. This period of freefall is solid evidence that explosives had to be used to bring the building down. In the final draft for public comment (August 2008) NIST denied that WTC7 fell at freefall. In the final report in Nov 2008 they reversed themselves and admitted freefall, but denied its obvious significance.
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
-----------------
My new DVD: "9/11 Analysis" is now out. Go to http://www.911speakout.org .

2K 0

[This is being reposted becuse the previous version was corrupted (hacked?). Please update any links or embeds.]

In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 coverup.
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
------------------
Go to http://www.911speakout.org .

318 0

This is not the "Part II" I had originally envisioned. That will have to wait for Part III. In following up on the erroneous measurement described by John Gross in Part I, I decided to look more carefully at the measurement and find the video frame NIST claims marks the beginning of the collapse. What I found is that there is no motion of the roofline for at least 20-30 video frames after the point identified by John Gross. In other words, the measurement is a complete fabrication with the goal of producing a "measurement" to agree with the result predicted by NIST's collapse model. This result is sufficiently significant to merit its own video.
...More to come soon in Part III.
(For more on John Gross, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg )
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
------------------
My new DVD: "9/11 Analysis" is now out. Go to http://www.911speakout.org .

366 0

Part III of this series fully explores the implications of NIST's admission that WTC7 entered actual freefall and critiques the foundations of their "investigation." In the end it calls for a new, independent, fully empowered, and open investigation.
-----
[The WTC7 series has elicited a number of questions from people unclear on the details of how I did the measurements, compared to how NIST did them and how the representatives of NIST described their measurements. I have therefore created a WTC7 Measurement FAQ page: http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf . I will also use this FAQ as a place of reference for other questions that arise as well.]
------------------
My new DVD: "9/11 Analysis" is now out. Go to http://www.911speakout.org .

529 0

This is the first of 3 segments on the new AE911Truth.org Companion Edition to Blueprint for Truth. In just 10 minutes Richard Gage, AIA of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth takes you through most of the scientific forensic evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the destruction of WTC 7 was accomplished with explosive controlled demolition. This DVD is available at the AE911Truth online store, http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=96 packaged together along with the 30 and 60 minute versions of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth. See the extended 2 hour Research Edition for the complete array of evidence and background information! Visit http://www.ae911truth.org/ for further details.

Preview the New AE911Truth.org 9/11 Documentary 2011 "9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw

Pre-Order the DVD September 1st 2011:
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=145

Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts":
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=143

Follow AE911TRUTH around the Web:
http://AE911truth.org/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html
http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org
http://www.AE911truth.org
http://www.BuildingWhat.org
http://www.Facebook.com/ae911truth
http://www.Twitter.com/ae911truth
http://www.Youtube.com/ae911truth
http://www.Flickr.com/ae911truth
http://www.AE911truth.net/store/
http://www.AE911truth.org/911investigator

1.3K 0

ReThink911 is a global ad campaign to raise public awareness of the freefall collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20pm on September 11, 2001.
http://rethink911.org/donate

"51% of respondents are sure or suspect that Building 7's collapse was caused by a controlled demolition, compared to just 18% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 31% who don't know" - ReThink911's Canadian YouGov Poll

390 30

Study this carefully. He knows CD when he sees it.

Background: https://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/550-jowenko.html

Jowenko was killed in a suspicious car accident in July 2011.

87 51

----------COPYRIGHT-----------


Music and video that explores some of the myriad of unanswered questions surrounding the events of september 11th 2001. This work was done to support the call for a new and thorough independent inquiry into the events of 9/11.

This beautiful song and video it was gently transfer by the user

marndin : http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=marndin

MANY THANKS.

Please visit also this page :

http://www.911building7.co.uk

You can ear and download the music in mp3 file!!

Enjoy!! 🙂


---------------------------------------------
Please, join in my communities on ORKUT :

www.orkut.com

Every day, they are new members :

New World Order :

2.813 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=24627631


Microchip :

372 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=27801080



Reptilians

153 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=27793111



DAVID ICKE :

93 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=28087116


Chemtrails :

106 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=27746643



HAARP PROJECT :

67 MEMBERS

http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=19269006

81 21

When original pieces like this start appearing about Building 7, I realize the freshness of this social movement is still with us—still alive. This is crucial, since we are entering a time when some of the old guys, like me, are fading away and the really young folks don't remember 9/11. It is so important for the rest of you to keep open the doors of inspiration ... and maintain a vigorous tradition of sparkling dissent. —Graeme MacQueen, 2019

Building 7 needs your video! In keeping with our efforts to preserve the commons, to preserve human dignity, autonomy, and agency, we invite artists involved in graphics and video production, who share our love of truth, to join in and interpret our music by making their own music video(s) for this song, which is here on YT under a Creative Commons license. So create away, and make sure to share your awesome video with us in the comments!

Lyrics

verse 1
building seven, oh, where did you go?
forty-seven stories from ground zero
made in red masonry, and occupied
by giuliani’s indestructible lair

the zealous cows that lead the team
to inquire of your whereabouts
said you collapsed from raging fires
a buckled i-beam vaporized your floors

chorus 1
cognitive infiltration
dulling the minds of the masses
time for manipulation
dominating the lower classes

verse 2
servile sycophants and media goons
crushing voices that question the tale
supplied us all with a mass of lies
mesmerizing and to hypnotize

bridge
a genius in mass persuasion
cassis sunstein
pushing a new kind of kool aid

chorus 2
cognitive infiltration
dulling the minds of the masses
time for manipulation
dominating the lower classes

outro (feat. yena)
building 7
where did you go?
made you go up
made you go down

band website:
https://www.theextraditions.com/

21 1

(Day 2 - Speaker 2) Engineer Daniel takes walks us through the peculiar details and circumstances of the first ever collapse of a modern steel structure, said to be caused by "sporadic office fires" and answers the question, "was there more to 911 than what we've been told?"

9 3

Compare these failed controlled demolitions to the complete destruction of WTC 7 on 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA According to the NIST WTC 7 report, the demolition crews should have just set these buildings on fire if they wanted to completely demolish them.
_____

You can purchase the full length DVD "9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out" at http://shop.ae911truth.org/DVD-Cased-9-11-Explosive-Evidence-Experts-Speak-Out-DVD-ESO-CASED1-PP.htm?sourceCode=ytDemoXSuccs_Xctvw0KZpfI

Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts":
http://shop.ae911truth.org/Book-9-11-Simple-Facts-Why-Official-Story-Cant-Be-True-Naiman-BK-NAIMROBE-SIMPLFACTS-PP.htm?sourceCode=ytDemoXSuccs_Xctvw0KZpfI

Follow AE911TRUTH around the Web:
http://AE911Truth.org
http://ReThink911.org
http://911ExpertsSpeakOut.org
http://911ExpertsSpeakOut.com
http://911BlueprintForTruth.org
http://facebook.com/ae911truth
http://twitter.com/ae911truth
http://youtube.com/ae911truth
http://flickr.com/ae911truth
http://shop.AE911Truth.org?sourceCode=ytDemoXSuccs_Xctvw0KZpfI

Please support the work of AE911Truth, a non-partisan non-profit 501c3 organization with your financial support by visiting http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home/68-contribute-to-ae911truth/420-donate-ae911truth.html today! We are a community organization with no corporate sponsorship. YOU are our lifeline.

152 29

http://WTC7evaluation.org

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, PE, SE, introduces the WTC 7 Evaluation study to the Associated General Contractors of Alaska, November 4, 2015.

Title: “A Presentation to the Associated General Contractors of Alaska”

Project topic: World Trade Center (WTC) Building 7

World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation is an engineering study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse. Hulsey is the Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.

Structural engineers, civil engineers, mechanical engineers, architects, building design and construction professionals, physicists, mathematicians, scientists, as well as everyday citizens, are invited to get involved. Every aspect of the scientific process will be posted at http://WTC7Evaluation.org. The study is being crowd-funded by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

For more information visit http://WTC7Evaluation.org

Subscribe to stay updated.

301 9

http://WTC7Evaluation.org

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, PE, SE, introduces the WTC 7 Evaluation study to the University of Alaska Fairbanks Student Chapter of the American Society of Civil Engineers, October 15, 2015.

Title: “A Presentation to the University of Alaska Fairbanks
Student Chapter of the American Society of Civil Engineers”

Project topic: World Trade Center (WTC) Building 7

World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation is an engineering study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse. Dr. Hulsey is the Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.

Structural engineers, civil engineers, mechanical engineers, architects, building design and construction professionals, physicists, mathematicians, scientists, as well as everyday citizens, are invited to get involved. Every aspect of the scientific process will be posted at http://WTC7Evaluation.org. The study is being crowd-funded by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

For more information visit http://WTC7Evaluation.org

Subscribe to stay updated.

614 7

At the "Justice Rising" conference on Sept. 11, 2020, AE911Truth’s Ted Walter, Tony Szamboti, and Mick Harrison of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry discussed the latest on the “request for correction” to NIST's 2008 report on WTC 7. For more info, visit https://AE911Truth.org/nist.

334 140

Read the Lawyers' Committee for 911 Inquiry Grand Jury Petition here http://lcfor911.org

At a two-day Symposium ‘9/11: Justice in Focus’ held Sept. 10th and 11th at historic Cooper Union Great Hall in New York City, renowned technical and legal professionals formally committed to further investigate and comprehensively prosecute the crimes of 9/11.

The Conference featured keynote addresses by former Chief Justice and Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy Ferdinando Imposimato and New York Times “Pentagon Papers” attorney Daniel Sheehan who joined a panel of experienced lawyers providing legal analysis of forensic-evidence testimony from licensed engineering and architectural professionals.

Moderating were international human rights attorney William Pepper and New York University professor Mark Crispin Miller.

Also speaking:
Mick Harrison Co-Chairman of Lawyers’ Committee for 911 inquiry,Inc.
Richard Gage, AIA Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11Truth.
J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., PE, SE Professor of Civil Engineering.
Wayne Madsen Independent Investigative Journalist, NSA whistleblower.
Michael Springmann Attorney and Former U.S. Diplomat, State Department whistleblower.
Bill Jacoby Secretary of 9/11 Truth Action Project.
Bob Mcilwaine 9/11 Family Member
Graeme McQueen Director of the Centre for Peace Studies at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.
Michael Diamond, Esq.
Wayne Coste Engineer.
Lionel Nationally syndicated American radio and television personality.
Andrew Kreig Public affairs commentator, author, attorney and legal reformer
Barbara Hoeneggar Researcher, author and public speaker on the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the anthrax attacks.
Bill Veale Filed the lawsuit in 2008 on behalf of April Gallop
Dave Meiswinkle Retired New Brunswick police officer, a United States Army veteran, and presently a criminal defense attorney.
Dylan Avery “Loose Change”
Eric Lawyer Firefighters for 9/11 truth.
Jane Clark Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
Neils Harrit Chemist, University of Copenhagen
Jeffrey Steinberg
Jon Cole, PE Civil Engineer
Karl Golovkin Former US Customs Service agent, JFK
Les Jamieson Activist, 28 Pages.
Mustapha Ndanusa Attorney
Sander Hicks Playwright,Publisher
Sarah Nelson Co-founder with Danny Sheehan of the Romero Institute
Stephen Dusterwald S.E. Structural Engineer.
Tony Szamboti Mechanical design engineer.
David Chandler Retired Physics teacher, 9/11 videos

Read the Lawyers' Committee for 911 Inquiry Grand Jury Petition here http://lcfor911.org
Please help with a donation if you can, this legal work is expensive
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4MNAJTY6GPJM2&source=url

37 2

On December 16, 2016, at the BSA Space (home of the Boston Society of Architects), Dr. Leroy Hulsey, PE, chair of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, gives an update on his WTC 7 computer modeling study and its preliminary finding that fire could not and did not cause the building's collapse on 9/11.

He also outlines the next steps of his research, which will include an exploration of the failures required to reproduce the observed symmetrical, free-fall behavior of the building.

For more information, visit http://AE911Truth.org and http://WTC7Evaluation.org.

160 26

We are proud to announce the release of the final report of the four-year computer modeling study of World Trade Center Building 7 by researchers the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

AE911Truth is a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.

Richard Gage, AIA , a 30-year architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will introduces the presenter, civil engineer Roland Angle, PE. Roland serves as the director of AE911Truth's Project Due Diligence outreach to the engineering profession.

Roland graduated from UC Berkeley and began his career by designing hardened missile silos to withstand nuclear bomb blasts. He went on to a broad career in the civil engineering and construction field spanning the last 50 years.

Roland provides the highlights of the study that was led by Professor Leroy Hulsey and his team of PhD researchers at UAF. Professor Hulsey, a top forensic structural engineer of 50 years, until recently served as the chair of the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering at UAF.

The UAF team has conducted a finite element analysis study of the collapse this 47-story skyscraper, the third to collapse on 9/11, which so many know nothing about. This high-rise fell suddenly at 5:20 PM – seven hours after the Twin Towers destruction.

Most notably, it fell symmetrical at free-fall acceleration into its footprint in under 7 seconds, in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition. Yet the National institute of Standards and Technology claimed, in their 1,000 page report issued seven years after the collapse, that the building fell due to normal office fires, which has never happened to any steel-frame, fire-protected building before or since 9/11.

A hearty thank you goes out to the thousands of concerned citizens who helped fund the university's historically important research. We encourage you to download the report at https://www.AE911Truth.org/wtc7 and take the time to understand the differences between the Hulsey report and the NIST report – and draw your own conclusions as to which better explains the collapse as we’ve now seen in the videos.

We invite you to also sign our petition at https://AE911Truth.org/petition, which calls upon Congress to open a a new investigation, and help us bring the report to the engineering community and to Congress. The more engineers who are raising their voices, the more Congress will listen and eventually be forced to open a new investigation.

We are submitting a Request for Correction to NIST, under the Data Quality Act, which will be based largely upon the findings in this Report. Our goal is to force NIST to correct its deeply flawed report.

If you are a structural engineer, we encourage you to sign on to this RFC now by emailing us - RFC@AE911Truth.org. Even If you were not listening live with us today – but on the archive video of the webinar – we can still amend your name to the list of concerned structural engineers signed on to this important document. Again – just email us at RFC@AE911Truth.org

A special thanks to everyone at the University of Alaska Fairbanks – particularly Professor Hulsey. We are proud to have supported the university in performing this truly scientific study.

901 297

For more information, visit https://AE911Truth.org/wtc7.

1.7K 827

http://WTC7Evaluation.org

World Trade Center Building 7 Evaluation is an engineering study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse. The study is being conducted by Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, and two Ph.D. research assistants. Professionals from the fields of structural engineering, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, architecture, building design and construction, physics, math, and science, as well as everyday citizens, are invited to get involved. Every aspect of the scientific process will be posted onhttp://WTC7Evaluation.org. The study is being crowd-funded by the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

For more information visit http://WTC7Evaluation.org

Subscribe to stay updated, and please share with your colleagues

854 21

Dr. Leroy Hulsey discusses his WTC 7 computer modeling study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and its preliminary finding that fire could not and did not cause the building's collapse on 9/11. He also outlines the next steps of his research, which will include an exploration of the failures required to reproduce the observed symmetrical, free-fall behavior of the building.

For more information visit http://AE911Truth.org and http://WTC7Evaluation.org.

128 17

JUSTICE IN FOCUS HIGHLIGHTS:

Dr. Leroy Hulsey Testifies before Panel of Attorneys on September 11, 2016

Today, we invite you to watch Dr. Leroy Hulsey present the preliminary findings of his WTC 7 computer modeling study to the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. Dr. Hulsey is a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and the chair of UAF’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

When asked by the panel of attorneys, “On a scale of 1 to 100, how probable do you think it is that this building could have collapsed simply because of the fire?” Dr. Hulsey stated categorically, “Zero.” Asked if he would flunk one of his Ph.D. students for turning in the kind of analysis that NIST did, he replied emphatically, “Yes.”

You may watch the entire 16 hours of proceedings in the Justice In Focus video archive by making a donation of any amount here: http://bit.ly/JIFarchiveDonate

http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/

Learn More: http://www.ae911truth.org/news/322-news-media-events-wrap-up-of-justice-in-focus-symposium-9-11-and-the-path-forward.html

447 147