4 Researchers | 4 Theories
A Live-Streamed Online Event for the 9/11 Truth Movement
It All Happened Saturday March 19, 2022!
Hosted by RichardGage911 – Listen to the 9/11CON Opening:
The Challenge
The Pentagon attack and resulting disinformation from our government and media has fostered a plethora of speculation and theories with consequent confusion and frustration in the 9/11 Truth Movement for the last 20 years.
“No plane hit the Pentagon!”
“A plane hit the Pentagon!”
“A plane flew over the Pentagon!”
“A missile hit the Pentagon!”
“Pre-placed explosives racked the Pentagon!”
“It was a combination of the above!”
A Solution
We brought together prominent experts in ONE PLACE at ONE TIME
Can we reach consensus? Not likely. But, we all need clarity on the Pentagon issue. And while some of the theories presented do have overlapping facts and findings, they also contain quite distinct elements setting themselves apart.
We had coherent evidence-based presentations in an organized format in a trusted venue with the major researchers who brought the facts and took on the tough questions.
But who are these researchers?
The Schedule
Theory A: Multiple explosions from pre-placed explosives, not due to a plane impact, and a plane, not Flight 77, destroyed at/near the helipad
Barbara Honegger – 9/11 Researcher, Author, Documentarian and Activist Creator of the video documentary “Behind The Smoke Curtain: What Happened at The Pentagon on 9/11, What Didn’t, and Why It Matters”. She is Co-Chair of The Board of Directors and Investigative Researcher of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. (She is not speaking on behalf of LC911 at this conference.) Barbara served in high level positions in the U.S. Government, including Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President and Senior Military Affairs Journalist with the Dept. of Defense.
Theory B: A Missile Struck the Pentagon
Thierry Meyssan – Author: Pentagate (2002); 9/11 The Big Lie (2002)
Thierry is a French intellectual who founded Voltaire Network International – a web of non-aligned press groups dedicated to the analysis of international relations. Originating from diversified political, social and cultural backgrounds, the members of Voltaire Network collectively adhere to the principles of the 1955 Bandung Conference.
Theory C: No 757 Hit the Pentagon
Craig Mckee / Adam Ruff – 9/11 Researchers
Craig is a journalist in Montreal, Canada. He created the blog Truth and Shadows in 2010 and joined the staff of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in 2019. (His conference participation is independent of AE911Truth.) He holds a BFA in Film and a Graduate Diploma in Journalism.
Adam is a 9/11 researcher of 20 years and co-founder of We Are Change Los Angeles. He created Unspun Newz – and has completed numerous video productions about 9/11 and other false flag operations over the past 15 years. Adam has focused on Pentagon research in particular for over a decade.
Theory D: A plane with the dimensions of a Boeing 757 impacted the Pentagon
David Chandler / Wayne Coste 9/11 Researchers
David is best known for his research on the WTC building collapses – leading NIST to admit that WTC 7 underwent free-fall. He has a Bachelor’s degree in physics and a Master’s degree in mathematics and taught physics and mathematics for 35 years. His research is on his website 911speakout.org.
Wayne compiled a 17 chapter video assessment of the Pentagon evidence, scrutinizing the damage and deciphering its meaning – available at 911speakout.org. He is a licensed professional engineer with nearly 50 years of professional experience, and has a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 1977.
Conference Format
- Presentations: Our Presenters had 1.5 hours to present evidence for their respective theories
- Closed Q&A: The other Presenters then had 30 minutes to ask their questions!
- Networking Breaks: Between presentations was the time to watch some incredible films and connect with others with the Eventee smartphone app.
- Open Q&A: 8PM to 10PM Pacific: We heard fantastic questions from the attendees to all the assembled presenters. And we found that they actually had much in common that they agreed about.
What Really Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11?
Well… what does the evidence show us?
Your hosts are Richard and Gail at RichardGage911
- Richard is a 30-year architect and the founder and former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (now acting independently at RichardGage911). He continues to lead the charge toward a new investigation of the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11 while bringing experts & activists in and around the 9/11 Truth Movement via his new video podcast RichardGage911:UNLEASHED!
- Gail is the wife and assistant of Richard Gage, AIA, and now the COO of Richard Gage, AIA, LLC. She now manages Richard’s speaking events & radio interviews as well as accompanying him around the US and Mexico handling travel arrangements, accounting, and photography.
9/11CON Re-builds 9/11 Community
- 9/11CON is a safe place to exchange ideas & scientific evidence
- Hundreds of us are here – not just to listen hard and take notes and learn something outside of our own confirmation bias, but to connect with each other!
Who came to the Conference?!
Hundreds from across the US and around the world:
“I’m looking forward to the amazing opportunity to hear from leading experts who have dedicated their lives in the pursuit of truth, spending years and countless hours researching the events of 9/11 – together now discussing the Pentagon and the conclusive evidence of what wasn’t there.”
Drew Peck – Idaho
“I’m coming because a civilized discussion about the Pentagon is long overdue, and Richard Gage is one of the few who can offer a platform and pull it off.”
Sandra Jelmi – Montreal, Quebec
“I’m coming because we need to tend to the festering wound that is the Pentagon if we care about uniting the Truth Movement.”
Ben B. – Yuma, AZ
“I’m all over 9/11CON because, to move forward in the 9/11 Truth Movement, we need to – at least try – to find some consensus on what happened at the Pentagon.”
Dan Noel – Orange Co., CA
“I will tell my friends – because Richard Gage is offering a platform for the various theories to be pitted against each other in a professional setting.“
Nate – Wheatridge, CO
“I’m attending this conference to hear different theories or accounts on what happened on 9/11. I am excited to go in without bias to see what I can learn.”
James Bradley, Moscow, ID
Here’s what you get from 9/11 CON:
- Watch the visually dynamic presentations
- Learn the latest evidence from the Pentagon experts
- Grow outside your own confirmation bias
- Expand your 9/11 Truth awareness and critical thinking skills
- Acquire new information and develop an informed opinion
- Cast your vote for the most powerful evidence
- Engage with other attendees and exchange ideas
- Make new friends and fellowship in the 9/11 Truth community
- Get properly equipped to be an effective 9/11 Truth activist
Visit Our Sponsors!
Very well presented. Every quote was awesome and thanks for sharing the content. Keep sharing and keep motivating others.
I have supported A&E truth for years. A portion of my Amazon purchases still goes to them. No matter what truth, facts, or evidence is presented, no one will be held accountable for 911, Covid, JFK, Waco, Charles Manson, Franklin Cover-up etc.
I am so sad that you couldn’t keep the your theories about COVID to yourself. The whole establishment was waiting after all these years to trip you up at something like that. An impeccable record and life’s work almost destroyed. So sad. However, for me you are still a hero, albeit cut down from super human stature to normal fallible human. You are still the father of 9/11 research, and for that you deserve my respect and admiration. You still have it, Richard. I love you!!
It’s BS that Richard ruined the 9/11 Truth Movement’s chances by getting 30 minutes cut from Spike Lee’s documentary. Anyone who knows anything about the way the media works knows that Spike would’ve been equally pressured to retract that 30 minutes whether Richard had said anything or not. It’s so obvious that A&E is infiltrated by controlled opposition which doesn’t want any association between 9/11 and Covid19. In time we’ll see the wisdom in raising awareness about False-Flags in their various forms.
Good preamble Richard. Joining the dots. You might be interested to dot the Christchurch Mosque attack on your map of reference.
Barbara thinks the Russian Fed is ‘going further than Ukraine’ is fear-mongering..that it might get ‘the big guy’ idiot president ‘to defend every inch’ of an aggressor NATO alliance, is 10/1 bookies odds: fiction. Goodness. This is about UKRAINE and the NATO alliance using it as proxy. Pushing their sticks into Russian eyes. The Biolabs in Ukraine are USAMO ! The arming and training of the nazi battalions, is NATO USAMO. Just like ISIS in Syria. Just like alQaeda and 911. Putin is telling us the bioweapons are USAID, and any preparation for deployment is FALSE FLAG by the same turnips that set the sequences off in the towers . Rationalise this behind the green screen of MOCKINGBIRD wurlitzer. The RF were watching the nazii AZOV/SVOBODA massing on the Donbass and Crimea with stated intention to ‘ethnically cleanse’ it of all Russians. Change the word ‘Russian’ to ‘Jewish’ and you get the picture. They were going to go. The bioweapons false flag on the face of it is western alliance tactic. So who knows what RF intelligence had on that possibility and then the yapper Zelensky called for nuclear weapons on Russias border !!
Cuban missile crisis anyone !?
Anything to do with COVID ?
Dear Richard.
I first donated today. (march 20.) Had det date wrong in my head.
Is there a stream/ video version of the conference?
I would so much love to see / hear it.
(And if not, it would have been helpful, if donations for that event had been closed)
Kind regards
Thomas
Yes! We’ve updated this 9/11CON web page.
Archive is now available!
THERE ARE MORE DOTS TO CONNECT. ……………………….
GOD BLESS YOU ALL FOR YOUR EXTRAORDINARY EFFORTS TO BRING THIS EVIL TREASONIST ACTION INTO THE LIGHT.
THERE’S A TIMIMING FOR EVERYTHING .
GOD’S timing is PERFECT.
SAMUEL 17 vs 51.
I paid my $25 but can’t find how to get in!!!! Damn.
2nd round Message says this is a duplicate post IT IS NOT.
Hi Delores – please search in your e-mail inbox for an e-mail from “Eventee” and click on “Join the event”. Alternatively, see in this 9/11CON article above the “Watch the archive” and use the link “Re-enter the conference.”
You can still watch the archive!
I paid my $25 but can’t find how to get in!!!! Damn.
how do i get to meting
Hi Delores – please search in your e-mail inbox for an e-mail from “Eventee” and click on “Join the event”. Alternatively, see in this 9/11CON article above the “Watch the archive” and use the link “Re-enter the conference.”
You can still watch the archive!
Even Donald Trump as President of the United States openly admits that “Iraq did not blow-up the the World Trade Center on 9/11”.
Only the CIA has the expertise for an inside job of this magnitude, especially considering that five (5) days before the crime the then U.S. President George W. Bush appointed Robert Mueller to direct the FBI with the sole mission to cover-up the resulting slaughter of 3,000 people almost at front of the federal courthouse. .
Up to this day the CIA and FBI terrorists continue their Orweillian police state costing billions of dollars for the fake “war on terror”.
Thanks to the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc and other similar groups the truth will be known.
I registered but do not know how to join the conference. Can you help? Thank you
Hi Delores – please search in your e-mail inbox for an e-mail from “Eventee” and click on “Join the event”. Alternatively, see in this 9/11CON article above the “Watch the archive” and use the link “Re-enter the conference.”
You can still watch the archive!
One should not forget that the New York Times reported a few weeks after 9/11 that the CIA’s New York offices had been directly located inside of – guess where – WTC7!
The New York Times, Nov. 4, 2001:
A NATION CHALLENGED: THE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; Secret C.I.A. Site in New York Was Destroyed on Sept. 11
https://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/04/us/nation-challenged-intelligence-agency-secret-cia-site-new-york-was-destroyed.html
Quote:
“The C.I.A.’s undercover New York station was in the 47-story building at 7 World Trade Center, one of the smaller office towers destroyed in the aftermath of the collapse of the twin towers that morning. All of the agency’s employees at the site were safely evacuated soon after the hijacked planes hit the twin towers, the officials said.”
And since the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ WTC7 study has now conclusively proven that the destruction of WTC7 was a clear case of controlled demolition it would have been quite a feat for “Al-Qaeda” to prepare the building for controlled demolition while the CIA’s New York agents were hanging out there.
NO TIME-STAMPED VIDEO OF ANY TERRORISTS AT ANY AIRPORT RELATED TO 9/11
NO VIDEO OF A PLANE AT THE PENTAGON
NO JET FUEL GROUND CONTAMINATION AT PENTAGON OR SHANKSVILLE
NO WRECKAGE AT SHANKSVILLE
NO FIRE AT SHANKSVILLE
DEBRIS 8 MILES AWAY
IMPOSSIBLE PLANE SPEEDS AND ACROBATIC MANEUVERS
OVERWHELMINGLY OBVIOUS FALSE FLAG OPERATION AS OUTLINED IN THE PNAC LITERATURE
NIST COVER-UP
PENTAGON COVER-UP
COMMISSION REPORT COVER-UP, WHITEWASH, UNDERFUNDED, DELAYED
FBI COVER-UP
BUSH LYING
CHENEY LYING
RUMSFELD LYING
RICE LYING
KISSINGER RESIGNS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ACCUSED TERRORIST STILL ALIVE
BIN LADEN NEVER PROVEN TO BE INVOLVED
IMPOSSIBLE PHONE CALLS FROM PLANES
IMPOSSIBLE PLANE SPEED
MINETTA TESTIMONY
NO JET INTERCEPTORS
PENTAGON TRILLIONS
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
ANTHRAX AMES STRAIN LINKED TO U.S.
MAJOR ELEVATOR RENOVATION
BOMB SNIFFING DOGS REMOVED
MILITARY GRADE NANO-THERMITE
FIRE BURNING OVER 3 MONTHS
MOLTEN METAL
NUMEROUS WHISTLEBLOWERS
3000 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS AND THIS NUMBER IS GROWING
FIREFIGHTERS
MEDICS
POLICE
PILOTS
MEDIA
THOUSANDS OF WITNESSES
PICTURES
VIDEOS
EXPLOSIONS
ILLEGAL TORTURE
FREE FALL
PULL-IT
PUT OPTION INSIDER TRADING LINKED TO WHITE HOUSE
EPA
AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON INTO EVERY ASPECT OF 9/11
reasonable doubt
NO TIME-STAMPED VIDEO OF ANY TERRORISTS AT ANY AIRPORT RELATED TO 9/11
NO VIDEO OF A PLANE AT THE PENTAGON
NO JET FUEL GROUND CONTAMINATION AT PENTAGON OR SHANKSVILLE
NO WRECKAGE AT SHANKSVILLE
NO FIRE AT SHANKSVILLE
DEBRIS 8 MILES AWAY
IMPOSSIBLE PLANE SPEEDS AND ACROBATIC MANEUVERS
OVERWHELMINGLY OBVIOUS FALSE FLAG OPERATION AS OUTLINED IN THE PNAC LITERATURE
NIST COVER-UP
PENTAGON COVER-UP
COMMISSION REPORT COVER-UP, WHITEWASH, UNDERFUNDED, DELAYED
FBI COVER-UP
BUSH LYING
CHENEY LYING
RUMSFELD LYING
RICE LYING
KISSINGER RESIGNS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ACCUSED TERRORIST STILL ALIVE
BIN LADEN NEVER PROVEN TO BE INVOLVED
IMPOSSIBLE PHONE CALLS FROM PLANES
IMPOSSIBLE PLANE SPEED
MINETTA TESTIMONY
NO JET INTERCEPTORS
PENTAGON TRILLIONS
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
ANTHRAX AMES STRAIN LINKED TO U.S.
MAJOR ELEVATOR RENOVATION
BOMB SNIFFING DOGS REMOVED
MILITARY GRADE NANO-THERMITE
FIRE BURNING OVER 3 MONTHS
MOLTEN METAL
NUMEROUS WHISTLEBLOWERS
3000 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS AND THIS NUMBER IS GROWING
FIREFIGHTERS
MEDICS
POLICE
PILOTS
MEDIA
THOUSANDS OF WITNESSES
PICTURES
VIDEOS
EXPLOSIONS
ILLEGAL TORTURE
FREE FALL
PULL-IT
PUT OPTION INSIDER TRADING LINKED TO WHITE HOUSE
EPA
AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON INTO EVERY ASPECT OF 9/11
reasonable doubt
just a little
“NO TIME-STAMPED VIDEO OF ANY TERRORISTS AT ANY AIRPORT RELATED TO 9/11”
your first point was already wrong which means everything else you’re going to follow with is wrong. timestamps on security videos are a desired feature, not a standard. you can look at plenty of other security video systems installed as examples to see for yourself. there is a timestamp on the stop still video ( another desired feature not a standard) of two of the hijackers at Jetport Maine before connecting to flight 11 at Boston Logan. There is no timestamp with the 5 flight 77 hijackers at Dulles Airport on the CCTV security video, however, that doesn’t mean the recording is not authentic or a dry run. One of the flight 77 passengers Mari-Rae-Sopper is seen in front of hijackers Khalid al Mihdhar and Majed Moqed after going through passenger security screening. Watch this film and become informed. https://youtu.be/_omKXktAnVM
why was Westover air force base evacuated night before 9/11?
what planes landed there on 9/11?
were the phone calls made from Westover forced, the callers tried to phone their families but added signals to the scripts they were reading under pressure? One woman managed to say something about what was going on “upstairs” and there were no stairs on those planes but there are stairs at Westover in a huge hangar.
plane left Westover and flew to air force base with crematorium.
firefighters who were at twin towers because of basement explosions and injuries spoke to reporters about this but were never questioned after
PBS did a short documentary of people at pentagon “during explosions” who told their experiences. One woman said they were wading through 3 feet of water, they scooped it up to drink as it was very hot inside as they searched for an escape. The woman said, “I asked ??? man what the flood was from and he told me it was jet fuel.” she went on to say she didn’t realize it was jet fuel and it didn’t taste bad…” This was on TV and should be available from PBS.
How could a plane dissolve into a ditch which had been there for years according to Pennsylvania residents who lived nearby, no luggage, no engines, all “absorbed” except for a passport of one the hijackers? Tossed out a window? on and on…
Most of the good documentaries are removed from YouTube or hidden now.
The 9/11 researcher who helped organize the closest 9/11 Conference to the Pentagon in 2013, lives closest to the Pentagon, drives by it every day, has done paid work inside, created a site listing the Top 20 Theories about 9/11 and the Pentagon, and developed the best explanation for the small hole and scattered plane parts on the lawn, should be allowed to speak at the Conference. Rehashing theories that failed to get us a new investigation is counter-productive. “No plane” theories only make the public think that Truthers are nuts. The Pre-Impact Plane Explosion Hypothesis provides a perfect explanation for what was observed by Pentagon Police Officers, and military professionals.
http://www.ANETA.org/theories/Pentagon
I hold a similar stake in an ‘on-impact’ supposition concerning the Twin Towers. First, because I touched this physical material in a scale mock-up and it burned my skin. It’s an important feature because the second, Tower #2 hit involved a resistance-free entry and Both were accompanied by laser-like outlines across each facade. Although one can measure the residual thermite and metallic components in the ash, this additional pyrophoric chemical mixture applied to the insides of the spandrel panels is likely extinguished so fast its residue is a white powder indistinguishable from smoke.
Secondly, all of the demolition factors matched prior public examples by CDI, who’s CEO admitted as such. And I presume their engineers foresaw a special need to conceal certain ‘tell-all’ audio signals from the general public, which didn’t work out exactly as planned.
Dear Gale and Richard: First off, I do appreciate that a few people, such as yourselves, have dedicated decades of their lives to finding and reporting 9/11 information that clearly indicates none of us know the full truth of what happened that day. You don’t know me and there’s no reason you should. I am no one of any importance. But, around 1997-98 I was invited to participate in a private email listserve by one of its participants, Michael Ruppert. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ruppert I can’t say who all participated, many were anonymous and, except for Mike—and, I believe, Peter Dale Scott https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Dale_Scott — I’ve long since forgotten the names of those who were not. Most were authors and investigators interested in drugs, drug-law reform, and the connection between CIA (et al) operations and illicit drug smuggling and its domestic and geopolitical implications.
From mostly lurking and observing the back-and-forth exchanges between these individuals, all far more directly involved than myself, I once posted something to this effect (I don’t recall my exact words): “One measure of a theory’s validity is its ability to predict future observations. If I’m reading the dynamics being discussed correctly, in the not too distant future there will be an event, most likely publicly perceived as a ‘terrorist attack,’ that will fundamentally shift public perception and, consequently, both domestic and geopolitical dynamics. Do you agree with this analysis?” The general consensus was “yes.” Thus, on Friday, September 7, 2021, Michael Ruppert posted to the list an alert indicating that “something” was about to happen. As I recall, his assessment was based on observing large and rapid shifts in the international banking and financial markets. To be clear, Mike was of the opinion that this “something” would occur within the monetary sphere. (Turns out he was correct, but the actual event he was foreseeing at that moment would not occur until September 11, 2008. Cf: https://www.cnbc.com/2009/09/10/the-financial-crisis-this-dayone-year-ago-sept-11-2008.html )
Nevertheless, his “alert” had all on the list in a state of watchfulness such that when the events of 9/11/01 began to unfold, all of the list participants—shocked and horrified as we were like everyone else—viewed them with quite a different, more informed and less surprised—point of view. Ruppert immediately posted to the list that we should begin “TiVoing” everything and—perhaps most importantly—stating that when such events occurred, the first “on the ground” reporting was the most reliable because, as he put it, “The official narrative will not yet have been fully established.” Thus, for example, the early reports of “explosions” being felt and heard in and around WTC prior to building disintegration, etc.
I’m sharing all this for two reasons:
FIRST, in regards to the Pentagon, it is important to remember that *THERE WAS LITTLE TO NO ON-THE-SCENE REPORTING—AND NO BROADCAST IMAGES—FROM AROUND THE PENTAGON UNTIL AFTER WTC DISINTEGRATION, AND SPECIFICALLY AFTER INTERIOR STRUCTURAL ‘COLLAPSE’ ABOVE THE AREA OF ‘IMPACT’.* In fact, the earliest reports that I recall were of a “possible truck bomb” having been “set off in front of the Pentagon.” This indicates that a) from the earliest moments what little *was* being seen and reported on the ground did *not* include impact by Flight 77; and b), beyond the understandable chaos, what little information was available from broadcast media was inconclusive at best and very likely tightly controlled.
In line with this, I want to point out that, however one-sided and pre-concluded Citizen Investigation Team’s presentation may have been in their “National Security Alert” video, the one witness they interviewed in-depth, taxi driver Lloyd England (Cf: https://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/videos/lloyde-england-eyeofthestorm ) MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT AND POTENTIALLY CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE ENTIRE PENTAGON SCENE WAS A STAGED EVENT.
It is beyond highly unfortunate—a piece of evidence in and of itself—that Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis were not trained, professional, journalist investigators, capable of conducting interviews that did not potentially compromise the integrity of their interviewee’s reportage. I say this not as any criticism or possible insulation regarding their intent but, rather, to point out: PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISM FAILED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY NOT INVESTIGATING, INTERVIEWING ON-THE-SCENE WITNESSES SUCH AS LLOYD ENGLAND, AND CRITICALLY ANALYSING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THEIR NARRATIVES. The very idea that a light pole could be knocked off its base by a large Boeing aircraft then relinquish its full momentum after spearing the windshield of a taxicab, causing little to no damage to the hood of the car, not to mention its driver, stretches credulity beyond the limits of reason. For sure it does, however, make a nice potential “human interest story” for a journalist hack with no interest in discerning facts, much less deconstructing a narrative that potentially implicates the deepest and darkest operations within our so-called “National Security” infrastructure.
SECOND: I want to point out that a) the political party in power during the 9/11 events was Republican. b) The subsequent “War on Terror,” beyond being predicated on the events of 9/11, also included the invasion of Iraq, predicated on the false “WMD” narrative (thus being every bit as much a war crime as is Putin’s current invasion of Ukraine), was conducted and furthered during both Republican and Democrat administrations. c) President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani was the mayor of NYC on 9/11 yet, obviously, not in the Emergency Command Center in WTC 7 as those events unfolded—yet, like Trump, has had very close ties with Putin and other Russian oligarchs. And, finally, and perhaps most importantly, d) it is one thing for a sitting President to attempt a self-coup to prevent the peaceful transfer of power of his own accord. It is quite another when that President is an Asset of a foreign power, operating on their behalf. The latter being nothing short of an act of war.
As Beau of the Fifth Column always says at the end of his YouTube channel’s presentations: IT’S JUST A THOUGHT.
A thought we might all best be giving considerable attention given current domestic and international events.
ERRATA: the word “insulation” re Ranke and Marquis was an autocorrect error. The intended word was “insinuation.”
Respectfully, the dates you cite do not make sense. “Thus, on Friday, September 7, 2021, Michael Ruppert posted to the list an alert indicating that “something” was about to happen.” ??? Did you mean to say 2001?
Election was stolen and CNN Acosta & MSM wack Russia! Russia! Russia! and it was your nirvana… Muller was less confused than you… Fusion GPS! Duh!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/muellers-team-told-congress-his-acuity-was-not-an-issue-some-lawmakers-privately-worry-it-was/2019/07/27/4ca51cf8-afcc-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html
But you’re right about Citizen Investigation Team’s presentation it’s hard evidence!
What happened to the WTC7 report done by the University of Alaska. It was my understanding that it was the smoking gun and bridge to the truth on 911. After all the pomp I don’t see it being acknowledge by any credible source. Obviously and for good reason I don’t see the MSM partaking in this eye opening event. are we truly banging our collect heads against a brick wall. Truth be know who do they really represent?
Today, its about listening.
HOPE THIS EVENT WILL PLEASE BE RECORDED. I know I can’t be present for the whole thing that day.
Thanks.
When I worked in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, I worked in Wedge #1. This gives me some insight into the pictures of the Pentagon taken on 911 because I worked there. The plane is far too wide to fit the hole. There is no wreckage of the plane outside the hole. The lawn that would have been torn up by the engines is relatively untouched.
It is easy to understand why so many truthers believe the following:
They believe the “757 hit the Pentagon Group” is an organized team of disinformation agents working to:
1. Create disruption and disharmony within the 911 Truth Movement
2. Get people to believe something closer to the Official Story
3. Make people waste their time on an unproductive effort
If one believes our mission is to “wake people up”, spending time and effort trying to make people believe a 757 might have hit the Pentagon, is a waste of time. What would be the motivation of people doing that?
He realizado cuatro reportajes para una revista española sobre el 9/11 y ustedes todos los del Movimiento por la Verdad han sido mi fuentes de información…..Gracias
Realmente me cuesta aceptar que un avión de aluminio pueda penetrar tan profundo en las torres de acero del WTC y en los enormes anillo del Pentágono, cuando vemos fotos de aviones comerciales que ha sido impactado por aves en los aeropuertos y aparecen con enormes boquetes en el fuselaje. Y tampoco puedo creer que un terrorista inexperto que no pudo obtener un certificado para volar un Cessna, haga una maniobra tan difícil y complicada como las de los aviones….. Eso es suficiente.
I really find it hard to accept that an aluminum plane can penetrate so deep into the steel towers of the WTC and the huge ring of the Pentagon, when we see photos of commercial planes that have been struck by birds at airports and appear with huge holes in the fuselage. And I also can’t believe that an inexperienced terrorist who couldn’t get a certificate to fly a Cessna, would do such a difficult and complicated maneuver like those of airplanes….. That’s enough
I’m somebody who WANTS to believe in Richard Gage, but a lot of things attached to him seem like a BUSINESS. I want to see this movie for free and donate later if I feel like it.
I was surprised not to see Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis of the Citizens Investigation Team . They have one of the most compelling pieces of evidence in their interviews and video . 11 witnesses , independently and not knowing each other saying the same thing. The plane and the flight pattern that they witnesses could have NEVER downed any light poles. Also , a confession from a minor player in the 911 scam admitting that what he did with his cab was staged. Where is the CIT ?
Yes, I wondered that myself. I can tell you that Chris Sarms posted a critique of their “National Security Alert” video not long after being produced. You can read it here: http://csarnsblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/national-security-alert-omissions-and.html — My problem is I have no means of verifying any reporting plus all the reporting is done by amateur investigators who make mistakes. Frustrating.
I am 75 old tech inclined man. I am not coming. I am facineted after 20 + yars of the event that people around me believe that the towers SMASHED THEMSELF TO DUST BY their own weight. The purpose is above my PAY GRADE. The !!STUPIITY!! IS not.
Dear Richard and Gale,
Thank you for all your work, and courage.
You contribution/donation website for the Pentagon Conference would not allow me to check out.
I must have missed something. I’ll keep trying via the log-in option.
Kent
Hello Kent, Gail Gage here. Thank you so much for your sweet encouragement, and for joining us for our 9/11CON – the Pentagon! I’m so sorry you’re having difficulty at the checkout phase of getting your ticket. Can you please be a little more specific about what is happening as I’d like to see if I can help. You can email me at Gail@RichardGage911.org if you’d like.
Gail