Technical Articles

A. Technical Documents – WTC 1, 2 & 7

A.1 The Controlled Demolition Theory

A.1.1 P S Kayley

A.1.2 Architects and Engineers

A.1.3 Mark Basile

A.1.4 Charles Beck

A.1.5 Ronald Brookman

A.1.6 David Chandler et al.

A.1.7 Wayne Coste et al.

A.1.8 A. K. Dewdney

A.1.9 Eric Douglas

A.1.10 Timothy Eastman and Jonathan Cole

A.1.11 Crockett Grabbe

A.1.12 David Griscom

A.1.13 Niels Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Frank Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James Gourley, and Bradley Larsen

A.1.14 Leroy Hulsey, Zhili Quan, and Feng Xiao

A.1.15 Steven Jones et al.

A.1.16 Robert Korol et al.

A.1.17 Kenneth Kuttler

A.1.18 Frank Legge

A.1.19 Jerry Lobdill

A.1.20 Graeme McQueen et al.

A.1.21 William Pepper

A.1.22 Gordon Ross et al.

A.1.23 Andre Rousseau

A.1.24 Kevin Ryan

A.1.25 Ansgar Schneider

A.1.26 Tony Szamboti et al.

A.1.27 Gregory Szuladzinski et al.

A.1.28 Adam Taylor

A.1.29 Gregory Urich

A.1.30 John Wyndham et al.

A.1.31 Others

A.2 Challenges to NIST by AE911Truth

A.3 Countering Disinformation, Samples

A.3.1 By AE911Truth

A.3.2 By Adam Taylor et al.

A.3.3 By David Chandler

A.3.4 By Others

B. Defenses of the Official WTC Collapse Narrative

B.1 Zdenek Bazant et al. — Mainstream Engineering Papers

B.2 FEMA – Reports, May 2002

B.3 NIST – Reports

B.3.1 Final Reports Released in September 2005

B.3.2 Final Reports Released in November 2008

B.4 Diversity of WTC Ignorance-Peddling

B.4.1 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

B.4.2 ADL —Anti-Defamation League

B.4.3 American Society of Safety Engineers

B.4.4 Europhysics News

B.4.5 Frank Greening et al.

B.4.6 RG Lee Group

B.4.7 Stephanie Singleton

B.4.8 James Millette

B.4.9 Maoxin Wu, Ronald Gordon, Robin Herbert, Maria Padilla, Jacqueline Moline, David Mendelson, Virginia Litle, William Travis, and Joan Gil

B.4.10 Anonymous

C. Alternative WTC Destruction Theories

C.1 The Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis

C.1.1 Richard Gage, with Jonathan Cole and Gregg Roberts

C.1.2 James Gourley

C.1.3 Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, and Others

C.1.4 Frank Legge

C.1.5 Tony Szamboti

C.2 The Nuclear Energy Hypothesis

C.2.1 AE911Truth

C.2.2 Steven Jones

(Table of Contents)

Articles

A. Technical Documents – WTC 1, 2 & 7

A.1 The Controlled Demolition Theory

A.1.1 P S Kayley

Sudden Building Collapse: An Evaluation of a New Risk in Operational Fire-fighting: An Independent Analysis, July 2016

A.1.2 Architects and Engineers

Ted Walter, Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says about the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7, 2015

Richard Gage, AIA, Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of WTC Building 7 on 9/11, September 2009

Billions of Previously Molten Iron Spheres in WTC Dust, Reveal Use of Thermitic Materials, August 2010

Witnesses of Molten Steel at Ground Zero, September 2016

World Trade Center Physics: Why Constant Acceleration Disproves Progressive Collapse, September 2016

A.1.3 Mark Basile

Mark Basile Progress Report, August 2014

A.1.4 Charles Beck

Mathematical Models of Progressive Collapse and the Question of How Did the World Trade Center Perish, October 2007

A.1.5 Ronald Brookman

The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7, March 2010

A.1.6 David Chandler et al.

Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics: Downward Acceleration of WTC 1, February 2010

Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics: Downward Acceleration of WTC 1 (Interpreted for a less technical audience)

Our Most Solid Evidence for the Use of Explosives in the Destruction of the World Trade Center

David Chandler, Ted Walter, and Tony Szamboti, The Instantaneous Free Fall of World Trade Center Building 7 and NIST’s Attempt to Hide It, June 2023

A.1.7 Wayne Coste et al.

Wayne Coste and Michael Smith, Neglecting Peer Review: A Case Study of Engineering Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) on 9/11, May 2014

John Wyndham, Wayne Coste, and Michael Smith, Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study, 2014

Investigating the Mechanics of Destruction at the Twin Towers on 9/11: The Case for Propelled Demolition, March 2020

“Surfing” the Big Wave on 9/11: Analysis of a Large Perimeter Column Wall Section of the South Tower, September 2020

A.1.8 A. K. Dewdney

Fourier-Based Calculations of Temperatures of Structural Steel in An Environment of Burning Jet Fuel and Office Furnishings

A.1.9 Eric Douglas

The NIST WTC Investigation: How Real Was the Simulation?, December 2006

A.1.10 Timothy Eastman and Jonathan Cole

WTC Destruction: An Analysis of Peer Reviewed Technical Literature, 2001 — 2012, April 2013

A.1.11 Crockett Grabbe

Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage, April 2007

Discussion of “Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis” by K.A. Seffen, February 2008

Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum

A.1.12 David Griscom

“Hand Waving” the Physics of 9/11

A.1.13 Niels Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Frank Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James Gourley, and Bradley Larsen

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, 2009

A.1.14 Leroy Hulsey, Zhili Quan, and Feng Xiao

A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7, March 2020

A.1.15 Steven Jones et al.

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?, September 2006

An Open Letter to Dr. Steven Jones by James Bennett, with Replies by Steven Jones, April 2007

Revisiting 9/11/2001 —Applying the Scientific Method, May 2007

Reply to Stephen Phillips (“A physicist critiques Steven Jones’ New Paper”, May 21, 2007), 2007

Greg Palast apologizes to Dr. Steven Jones: “An Apology and Hope for Reasoned Discourse,” 2007

Steven Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe, Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, January 2008

Steven Jones, Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Anthony Szamboti, and James Gourley, Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction, 2008

Kevin Ryan, James Gourley and Steven Jones, Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: Evidence for Energetic Materials, August 2008

Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter, 15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses, Europhysics News, July-August 2016

A.1.16 Robert Korol et al.

Robert Korol, Paul Heerema, and Ken Sivakumaran, The Collapse of WTC 7: A Re-Examination of the “Simple Analysis” Approach, February 2016

A.1.17 Kenneth Kuttler

WTC 7: A short Computation, June 2006

Estimates for Time to Collapse of WTC1

A.1.18 Frank Legge

9/11 – Evidence for Controlled Demolition: A Short List of Observations, June 2006

NIST Data Disproves Collapse Theories Based on Fire, August 2006

9/11 – The Twin Towers and Common Sense

9/11 – Acceleration Study Proves Explosive Demolition, November 2006

Conspiracy Theories, Myths, Skepticism, and 9/11: their Impact on Democracy, September 2007

Frank Legge and Tony Szamboti, 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible, December 2007

WTC 1 Collapse – What if the Columns Miss?, March 2008

9/11 – Proof of Explosive Demolition without Calculations, March 2008

9/11 and Probability Theory, June 2008

Controlled Demolition at the WTC: A Historical Examination of the Case, May 2009

Anonymous and Frank Legge, Falsifiability and the NIST WTC Report: A Study in Theoretical Adequacy, 2010

A.1.19 Jerry Lobdill

Molten What?, March 2007

Some Physical Chemistry Aspects of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Aluminum-Rich Microspheres, the Eutectic, and the Iron-Sulfur System as Applied to the Demise of Three World Trade Center Buildings on 9/11/2001, June 2007

A.1.20 Graeme McQueen et al.

118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers, August 2006

156 Eyewitnesses Whose Statements are Suggestive of Explosions in the Twin Towers, August 2006

Sonic Booms in the Collapse of the Twin Towers?, June 2007

Waiting for Seven: WTC 7 Collapse Warnings in the FDNY Oral Histories, January 2008

Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis, April 2009

Did the Earth Shake Before the South Tower Hit the Ground?, July 2009

A.1.21 William Pepper

The NIST Report on the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Challenged by 2,100 Architects and Engineers, December 2013

A.1.22 Gordon Ross et al.

Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Storeys of WTC 1, June 2006

Reply to Dr. Greening, August 2006

Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross, Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was an Inside Job (Updated Version II), September 2006

NIST and Dr. Bazant – A Simultaneous Failure, May 2007

Response to “Anonymous”: Partial Logic – Partial Answer

A.1.23 Andre Rousseau

Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted from New York on September 11, 2001?, November 2012

A.1.24 Kevin Ryan

High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers, June 2007

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites, July 2008

A.1.25 Ansgar Schneider

The Late Jolt: Re-Examining the World Trade Center Catastrophe, October 2019

A.1.26 Tony Szamboti et al.

Frank Legge and Tony Szamboti, 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible, December 2007

The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers, February 2008

Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis, April 2009

Gregory Szuladzinski, Anthony Szamboti, and Richard Johns, Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis, International Journal of Protective Structures, June 2013

Tony Szamboti and Richard Johns, ASCE Journals Refuse to Correct Fraudulent Paper They Published On WTC Collapses, September 2014

A.1.27 Gregory Szuladzinski et al.

Temporal Considerations in Collapse of WTC Towers, February 2012

Gregory Szuladzinski, Anthony Szamboti, and Richard Johns, Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis, International Journal of Protective Structures, June 2013

A.1.28 Adam Taylor

Other Collapses in Perspective: An Examination of Steel Structures Collapsing due to Fire and their Relation to the WTC, April 2013

Clarifying the Question of Collapse Times on 9/11, August 2021

Does Molten Aluminum Glow?, September 2013

A.1.29 Gregory Urich

Analysis of Mass and Potential Energy in the World Trade Center Twin Towers

Analysis of the Mass and Potential Energy of World Trade Center Tower 1, March 2007

A.1.30 John Wyndham et al.

John Wyndham, Wayne Coste, and Michael Smith, Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study, 2014

Peer Review in Controversial Topics —A Case Study of 9/11, June 2017

A.1.31 Others

Robert Moore, Statement Regarding Thermite: Part 1, January 2007

Brian Vasquez, Glowing Aluminum Disinformation?, February 2007

Wes Lifferth, A Description of Molten Aluminum Poured onto Rusty Steel, March 2007

Terry Morrone, Proof that the Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01, April 2007

Anon, Non-animated Visualization Aids to Assist in Understanding the Demolitions of the World Trade Center Twin Towers, November 2007

Scott Jones, An Independent Analysis of NIST’s Scientific Methods and Assumptions

A.2 Challenges to NIST by AE911Truth

Bob McIlvaine, Bill Doyle, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, AIA, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, request for correction submitted to NIST, April 2007

NIST, response to 2007 request for correction above, September 2007

James Gourley, Bob McIlvaine, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, AIA, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, appeal letter to NIST, October 2007

NIST, David Chandler, James Gourley, Lorie van Auken, Steven Jones, Mindy Kleinberg, and others, Technical Briefing on Building 7, Transcript, August 2008

David Chandler, response to NIST, 2008

NIST, Finding Regarding Public Safety Information, July 2009

William Pepper, The NIST Report on the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Challenged by 2,100 Architects and Engineers, December 2013

90+ signers, Request for Correction Under the Data Quality Act to NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, April 2020

NIST, denial of 2020 request for correction above, August 2020

90+ signers, Appeal of the Initial Decision Regarding the Request for Correction to NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, September 2020

90+ signers, Supplemental Data Related to the Request for Correction to NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, December 2020

AE911Truth, Request for Issuance of Final Decision, and Alternative Notice of Intent to Sue, June 2021

NIST, Response to Appeal of NIST’s Initial Decision under the Information Quality Standards Guidelines, June 2021

United States District Court for The District of Columbia, Case 1:21-cv-02365 Document 1 [AE911Truth at al.’s lawsuit against NIST for denying 2020 request for correction above], September 2021

United States District Court for The District of Columbia, Case 1:21-cv-02365 Document 22 [dismissing AE911Truth at al.’s 2021 lawsuit above], August 2022

A.3 Countering Disinformation, Samples

A.3.1 By AE911Truth

Focus on WTC 1, 2, and 7: 29 Structural and Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11, June 2009

Adam Taylor, What About the Planes That Slammed into The Twin Towers? Wouldn’t They Have Disturbed the Demolition Devices?, January 2012

Extremely High Temperatures and Molten Metal Evidence at WTC

Adam Taylor, What Is Nanothermite? Could It Have Been Used to Demolish the WTC Skyscrapers?, June 2012

Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports, April 2015

Why the AIA Should Support a New Investigation into the Complete Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, 2015

Robert Korol and Anthony Szamboti, A Response from the ‘Lay Critics’ Regarding ‘Mechanics-Based Mathematical Studies Proving Spontaneity of Post-Impact WTC Towers Collapse’ [unpublished by Europhysics], March 2017

A.3.2 By Adam Taylor et al.

A Critical Review of the “9/11 Mysteries Viewer’s Guide,” June 2011

A Response to Chris Mohr’s Respectful Rebuttal of Richard Gage’s 9/11 Blueprint for Truth, September 2014

Observations on NIST’s WTC Fireproofing Loss and Collapse Scenario for the WTC Towers, September 2020

John-Michael Talboo and Adam Taylor, Debunking 9/11 Debunking: On WTC’s Design to Withstand 707 Impact, October 2020

Collapse or Explosion? A Discussion of the WTC, “Sounds of Explosions” Issue, January 2021

A.3.3 By David Chandler

Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11

Greening vs. Chandler and Newton’s Laws, 2009

Response to Dave Thomas

A.3.4 By Others

Kevin Ryan, Manuel Garcia Sees Physics That Don’t Exist, December 2006

Francisco Gonzalez, Comments on Garcia’s Sept. 12, 2007, Article in Counterpunch, September 2007

Frank Legge, 9/11 – A Letter to a Die-Hard Supporter of the Official Explanation, October 2007

Andrea Dreger, Sources Related to Exceptionally High Temperatures, and/or to Persistent Heat at Ground Zero; Disinformation Regarding the Phenomena of “Molten Steel”/Exceptionally High Temperatures/Persistent Heat at Ground Zero; Pre-Collapse Pressure Pulses, July 2008

Frank Legge, Frank Greening versus Isaac Newton, May 2009

David Proe and Ian Thomas, Center for Environmental Safety and Risk Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, Comments on NIST WTC7 Report, March 2012

John-Michael Talboo and Ziggi Zugam, 9/11: Explosive Material in the WTC Dust, February 2016

Anthony Szamboti, Open Letter to Prof. Bazant [requesting correction of four papers published by the Journal of Engineering Mechanics], June 2016

P S Kayley, Sudden Building Collapse: An Evaluation of a New Risk in Operational Fire-fighting: An Independent Analysis, July 2016

American Institute of Architects, Resolution 16-3, Investigation of the Total Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 [voted down], 2016

Mick Harrison, Preliminary Legal Assessment, for Public Consumption, of NIST’s Final Decision on Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s WTC 7 Request for Correction, July 2021

Anthony Szamboti and Richard Johns, Request for further action in the matter of Tony Szamboti and Richard Johns’ Ethics Complaint against ASCE members [and former editors of the Journal of Engineering Mechanics] Roberto Ballarini and Kaspar Willam [over discussing Le and Bazant’s 2011 paper], May 2022

Anthony Szamboti and Richard Johns, Appeal of Decision [by the Journal of Engineering Mechanics’ editor Franz-Josef Ulm to uphold the non-publication of a discussion of Le and Bazant’s 2011 paper], June 2022

B. Defenses of the Official WTC Collapse Narrative

B.1 Zdenek Bazant et al. — Mainstream Engineering Papers

Zdenek Bazant and Yong Zhou, Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? —Simple Analysis, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, September 2001

Zdenek Bazant and Mathieu Verdure, Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, March 2007

Zdenek Bazant, Jia-Liang Le, Frank Greening, and David Benson, What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, March 2008

Zdenek Bazant and Jia-Liang Le, Closure to “Mechanics of Progressive Collapse: Learning from World Trade Center and Building Demolitions,” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, October 2008

Jia-Liang Le and Zdenek Bazant, Why the Observed Motion History of World Trade Center Towers Is Smooth, ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, January 2011

Jia-Liang Le and Zdenek Bazant, Mechanics of Collapse of WTC Towers Clarified by Recent Column Buckling Tests of Korol and Sivakumaran, June 2022

Jia-Liang Le and Zdenek Bazant, Spontaneous Collapse Mechanism of World Trade Center Twin Towers and Progressive Collapse in General, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, June 2022

B.2 FEMA – Reports, May 2002

World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Title Pages, Report Credits, Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1 Introduction

2 WTC 1 and WTC 2

4 WTC 4, 5, and 6

5 WTC 7

6 Bankers Trust Building

7 Peripheral Buildings

8 Observations, Findings, and Recommendations

A Overview of Fire Protection in Buildings

B Structural Steel and Steel Connections

C Limited Metallurgical Examination

D WTC Steel Data Collection

E Aircraft Information

F Structural Engineers Emergency Response Plan

G Acknowledgments

H Acronyms and Abbreviations

I Metric Conversions

B.3 NIST – Reports

B.3.1 Final Reports Released in September 2005

NIST NCSTAR 1: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-1: Design, Construction, and Maintenance of Structural and Life Safety Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-1A: Design and Construction of Structural Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-1A: Appendixes A-G

NIST NCSTAR 1-1A: Appendixes C-G

NIST NCSTAR 1-1B: Comparison of Building Code Structural Requirements

NIST NCSTAR 1-1C: Maintenance and Modifications to Structural Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-1C: Appendixes

NIST NCSTAR 1-1D: Fire Protection and Life Safety Provisions Applied to the Design and Construction of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 and Post-Construction Provisions Applied after Occupancy

NIST NCSTAR 1-1E: Comparison of Codes, Standards, and Practices in Use at the Time of the Design and Construction of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7

NIST NCSTAR 1-1F: Comparison of the 1968 and Current (2003) New York City Building Code Provisions

NIST NCSTAR 1-1G: Amendments to the Fire Protection and Life Safety Provisions of the New York City Building Code by Local Laws Adopted while World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 Were in Use

NIST NCSTAR 1-1H: Post-Construction Modification to Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-1I: Post-Construction Modifications to Fire Protection, Life Safety, and Structural Systems of World Trade Center 7

NIST NCSTAR 1-1J: Documentation of the Fuel System for Emergency Power in World Trade Center 7

NIST NCSTAR 1-2: Baseline Structural Performance and Aircraft Impact Damage Analysis of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-2A: Reference Structural Models and Baseline Performance Analysis of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-2B: Analysis of Aircraft Impacts into the World Trade Center Towers (Chapters 1-8)

NIST NCSTAR 1-2B: Chapters 9-11

NIST NCSTAR 1-2B: Chapters 9-11 and Appendix, scanned

NIST NCSTAR 1-3: Mechanical and Metallurgical Analysis of Structural Steel

NIST NCSTAR 1-3A: Contemporaneous Structural Steel Specifications

NIST NCSTAR 1-3B: Steel Inventory and Identification

NIST NCSTAR 1-3C: Damage and Failure Modes of Structural Steel Components

NIST NCSTAR 1-3C: Appendixes

NIST NCSTAR 1-3D: Mechanical Properties of Structural Steels

NIST NCSTAR 1-3E: Physical Properties of Structural Steels

NIST NCSTAR 1-4: Active Fire Protection Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-4A: Post-Construction Fires Prior to September 11, 2001

NIST NCSTAR 1-4B: Fire Suppression Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-4C: Fire Alarm Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-4D: Smoke Management Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-5: Reconstruction of the Fires in the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-5A: Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and Timeline Analysis (Chapters 1-8)

NIST NCSTAR 1-5A: Chapter 9-Appendix C

NIST NCSTAR 1-5A: Appendixes D-G

NIST NCSTAR 1-5A: Appendixes H-M

NIST NCSTAR 1-5B: Experiments and Modeling of Structural Steel Elements Exposed to Fire

NIST NCSTAR 1-5C: Fire Tests of Single Office Workstations

NIST NCSTAR 1-5D: Reaction of Ceiling Tile Systems to Shocks

NIST NCSTAR 1-5E: Experiments and Modeling of Multiple Workstations Burning in a Compartment

NIST NCSTAR 1-5F: Computer Simulation of the Fires in the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-5G: Fire Structure Interface and Thermal Response of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-6: Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of the World Trade Center Towers

NIST NCSTAR 1-6A: Passive Fire Protection

NIST NCSTAR 1-6B: Fire Resistance Tests of the Floor Truss Systems

NIST NCSTAR 1-6C: Component, Connection, and Subsystem Structural Analysis

NIST NCSTAR 1-6D: Global Structural Analysis of the Response of the World Trade Center Towers to Impact Damage and Fire

NIST NCSTAR 1-7: Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communication

NIST NCSTAR 1-7A: Analysis of Published Accounts of the World Trade Center Evacuation

NIST NCSTAR 1-7B: Technical Documentation for Survey Administration: Questionnaires, Interviews, and Focus Groups

NIST NCSTAR 1-8: The Emergency Response Operations

NIST NCSTAR 1-8: Appendixes A-L

B.3.2 Final Reports Released in November 2008

NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 ^*

NIST NCSTAR 1-9: Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, Volumes 1 and 2 ^*

NIST NCSTAR 1-9A: Global Structural Analysis of the Response of World Trade Center Building 7 to Fires and Debris Impact Damage ^*

* Errata for NIST NCSTAR 1A, NIST NCSTAR 1-9, and NIST NCSTAR 1-9A, Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7 (January 2009, April 2012, and June 2012)

B.4 Diversity of WTC Ignorance-Peddling

B.4.1 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

The 9/11 Commission Report, July 2004

B.4.2 ADL —Anti-Defamation League

Decade of Deceit: Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later, August 2011

B.4.3 American Society of Safety Engineers

Jeffrey Vincoli, Norman Black, and Stewart Burkhammer, SH&E at Ground Zero: A Firsthand Account from the Most Dangerous Workplace in the U.S., May 2002

B.4.4 Europhysics News

Letters to the Editors, September-December 2016, pp. 43-44

Jia-Liang Le and Zdenek Bazant, Mechanics-Based Mathematical Studies Proving Spontaneity of Post-Impact WTC Towers Collapse, January-February 2017, pp. 18-23

B.4.5 Frank Greening et al.

Energy Transfer in the WTC Collapse, February 2006

Aluminum and the World Trade Center Disaster, 2006

To Whom It May Concern, August 2006

Frank Greening’s Challenge to David Chandler, 2009

Greening and Greening, Characterization of a World Trade Center Dust Sample, 2017

Written Communication to John Wyndham, 2017

B.4.6 RG Lee Group

Damage Assessment, 130 Liberty Street Property: WTC Dust Signature Report, Composition and Morphology, Summary Report, December 2003

Damage Assessment, 130 Liberty Street Property: Expert Report, WTC Dust Signature, May 2004

B.4.7 Stephanie Singleton

The Truth About 9/11 Truth Movement: A Folkloristic Study, October 2017

B.4.8 James Millette

Progress Report on the Analysis of Red/Gray Chips in WTC Dust, February 2012

B.4.9 Maoxin Wu, Ronald Gordon, Robin Herbert, Maria Padilla, Jacqueline Moline, David Mendelson, Virginia Litle, William Travis, and Joan Gil

Case Report: Lung Disease in World Trade Center Responders Exposed to Dust and Smoke: Carbon Nanotubes Found in the Lungs of World Trade Center Patients and Dust Samples, April 2010

B.4.10 Anonymous

An Attack on Gordon Ross’ Work on the “Pile Driver” Theory

C. Alternative WTC Destruction Theories

C.1 The Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis

C.1.1 Richard Gage, with Jonathan Cole and Gregg Roberts

The Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis

C.1.2 James Gourley

Scientific Critique of Judy Wood’s Paper “The Star Wars Beam Weapon”

C.1.3 Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, and Others

Arabesque, “Thermite Hypothesis” versus “Controlled Demolition Hypothesis”: a response to “The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis”

Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, A Brief Analysis of Dr. Judy Wood’s Request for Correction to NIST: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Judy Wood, Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, Reply to “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” and Response

Gregory Jenkins, Introduction To an Interview with Dr. Judy Wood Conducted at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on January 10, 2007, Regarding the Use of Directed Energy Beams in The Demolition of The World Trade Center Towers, February 2007

Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, Interview with Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Greg Jenkins

Greg Jenkins, Arabesque, Reply to “Greg Jenkins interview Judy Wood: An Interview and Analysis” by Judy Wood, and Response

Gregory Jenkins, Matt Sullivan, The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers, April 2007

Gregory Jenkins, Solving The Great Steel Caper: DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence, 2007

Gregory Jenkins, Supplemental: Miscellaneous Topics, DEW-Demolition Contrary Evidence, 2007

C.1.4 Frank Legge

A Study of Some Issues Raised in a Paper by Wood and Reynolds, January 2007

C.1.5 Tony Szamboti

Why the damage to WTC Bldgs. 3 and 6 does not support the beam weapon hypothesis and some correspondence with Dr. James Fetzer about it, March 2007

C.2 The Nuclear Energy Hypothesis

C.2.1 AE911Truth

FAQ #15: The Nuclear Blast Hypothesis

C.2.2 Steven Jones

Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers, January 2007

Print This Page