VIDEO EVIDENCE

160.7K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Did rubble from the WTC really cause those eutectic formations ,as we were led to believe?

1.6K 2.6K

277.7K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn't matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone "thinks". Nothing can fool the laws of physics.

2.7K 4.7K

4.8M views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Why couldn't the National Geographic (or BBC) experts melt steel with thermite?
NOTE: THERMATE = Thermite + SULFUR
(The FEMA report could not explain the source of the SULFUR ) Learn more: www.911speakout.org

76.8K 30.5K

49.9K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method.

539 189

35.2K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method.

603 257

1M views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story adequately addressed the issue using the scientific method. (see more)

The direction and sequence of the primary forces to create the smooth motions observed in the towers destruction had to be "out and down". The official story is impossible because if it was “down then out” by gravity alone, there would have been impacts or jolts slowing or stopping the downward motion.

The DIRECTION of acceleration for any two (or more) objects is INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale, and always in line with the applied net force.

The SEQUENCE of forces acting on any two groups of accelerating objects is also INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale. If one can mimic the motions observed on a large group of objects with a series of forces applied to any small group of objects, then then larger group of objects, regardless of its mass, material, size and scale will have the same sequence and direction of net forces as the smaller group.

The motions of dissimilar small objects are used frequently to demonstrate the motions and forces acting on very large objects because the direction and sequence of net force on both are independent of mass, material, size and scale.

For example, the direction of acceleration and therefore direction of net force acting on a bucket tied to a rope whirled around your head, is similar to the motion and direction of net force acting on our moon orbiting the earth. The direction of acceleration due to the net force acting on both the bucket and the moon are similar, even though the bucket is not a scaled model of our moon.

No agency, no expert, no scientist, nobody has ever been able to make any real model demonstrating the forces necessary to mimic the smooth downward and outward accelerations observed during the twin towers fall using gravity and fire alone, because it's impossible.

14.7K 11.1K

46.9K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story adequately addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Does NIST think Newton's laws are only suggestions?

757 855

725K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Why can't the experts get their stories straight?

5.2K 4.9K

72K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Because when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

1.3K 1.7K

69K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issues using the scientific method. To find the truth, study the details.

1.4K 582

23K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issues outlined, using the scientific method. Even Hitler understands that physics trumps all propaganda, misinformation, "official explanations" and psudo-science.

570 142

70.5K views

YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Jet Fuel can't melt steel beams.

1.8K 2.3K

13K views

AE911Truth’s monthly webinar series continues today with a brand-new presentation by civil engineer Jonathan Cole.

ABOUT EARNING CPD CREDITS

Engineers can earn continuing professional development (CPD) credits for attending this webinar or watching the video of it afterward. To earn your CPD credits for this webinar, please take the short five-question quiz at https://AE911Truth.org/webinars.

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Jonathan Cole has been a registered professional engineer for over 35 years. In 2010, he began conducting real-world experiments in his backyard to either prove or disprove the official explanation of the Twin Towers and Building 7’s destruction. He is well-known to longtime students of 9/11 for the incisive videos he made documenting these experiments.

For the first time in a webinar format, Cole summarizes the results of his experiments related to the Twin Towers’ motion. He shows how none of the various hypotheses put forward — except controlled demolition with precisely placed devices — can explain a single aspect of the observed motion.

764 304

7.1K views

AE911Truth’s monthly webinar series continues today with a brand-new presentation by civil engineer Jonathan Cole.

ABOUT EARNING CPD CREDITS

Engineers can earn continuing professional development (CPD) credits for attending this webinar or watching the video of it afterward. To earn your CPD credits for this webinar, please take the short five-question quiz at https://AE911Truth.org/webinars.

ABOUT THE PRESENTATION

Jonathan Cole has been a registered professional engineer for over 35 years. In 2010, he began conducting real-world experiments in his backyard to either prove or disprove the official explanation of the Twin Towers and Building 7’s destruction. He is well-known to longtime students of 9/11 for the incisive videos he made documenting these experiments.

For the first time in a webinar format, Cole summarizes the results of his many experiments in this new webinar series.

In part two of this webinar series, Cole shares the results of his experiments regarding the extreme temperatures observed at the World Trade Center. He shows how none of the various hypotheses put forward — except controlled demolition using some form of thermite — can explain the multitude of evidence related to extreme temperatures.

463 224

4.2K views

Jonathan Cole confronta al NIST (Instituto Nacional de Estándares y Tecnología) y a Newton en estos experimentos de fuerza.

Enlace a los demás vídeos de AE Verdad 9/11 con subtitulos en español:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3C97FFD02177A68B&feature=view_all

Visiten la sección en español del sitio web AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/spanish.html) además de visitar la página de facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthes/

Newton vs NIST by Jonathan Cole - Spanish

43 3

760 views

Il carburante aereo non poteva fondere le travi in acciaio

Questo è il link alla playlist con altri video di AE911Truth sottotitolati in italiano:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAF177CCCFF880051&feature=view_all

Assicuratevi di visitare la sezione italiana di AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/italian.html), così come la pagina Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthit/

Jonathan Cole - For the Undying 911 MORONIC Replies - Italian

58 5

700 views

Porque não conseguem os peritos acertar as suas estórias?

Esta é uma ligação para outros vídeos da AE911Truth, legendados em Português:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL879EE8151F98A5B0&feature=view_all

Visite a secção em Português da AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/portuguese.html), bem como a página do Facebook em Português: https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthpt/

Expert vs Expert by Jonathan Cole - Portuguese

28 5

787 views

Czy gruzy z WTC naprawdę utworzyły te eutektyczne formacje, w co nakłaniano nas byśmy uwierzyli?

Adresy innych filmów wideo Stowarzyszenia AE911Truth z polskimi napisami można znaleźć na liście znajdującej się pod linkiem:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8AD7EB9DBD86CB5A&feature=view_all

Nie omieszkajcie zajrzeć do polskiej sekcji strony sieciowej AE911Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/news/languages/polish.html)
a także na naszą polską stronę na Facebooku: https://www.facebook.com/ae911truthpl/

The Mysterious Eutectic Steel by Jonathan Cole - Polskie napisy

27 2