Pakistani Journalist Interviews RG911: Explosive Evidence — All 3 WTC Towers!

Watch the whole series of 9/11-Related Interviews from Dr. Hasan Zafar

After interviewing Captain Dan Hanley of 911Pilots.org, Pakistani journalist Dr. Hasan Zafar got the bug and decided that he’s going to blow the whole 9/11 False Flag open on his new 9/11 Whistleblowers podcast series. In addition to us, he’s now interviewed Barbara Honegger, Ray McGinnis, Kevin Barrett, and Karl Schwarz.

From Dr. Zafar’s YouTube channel “Federal Post” introduction:

“Welcome to Federal Post, Pakistan’s emerging digital news channel dedicated to policy reforms, economic growth, youth empowerment, climate action, and digital innovation. Join insightful live sessions, exclusive expert interviews with leaders like Dr. Hasnain Javed, inspiring youth stories, and solution-focused podcasts. Subscribe for meaningful discussions shaping Pakistan’s future.”

An AI summary of the top 25 points in the interview reads as follows:

1. Introduction of Richard Gage: Richard Gage is an architect from the San Francisco Bay Area, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization with over 3,600 members demanding a new investigation into the World Trade Center collapses.
2. Initial Curiosity: Gage was spurred into researching 9/11 due to hearing David Ray Griffin on the radio discuss glaring issues with the World Trade Center’s destruction.
3. WTC 7 Collapses: One of the biggest questions Gage raises is about WTC 7, a building that was not hit by a plane, yet collapsed in the same manner as controlled demolitions.
4. Eyewitness Accounts: Multiple eyewitnesses, including medical students and firefighters, reported hearing explosions and seeing flashes before the buildings collapsed.
5. FEMA and NIST Reports: FEMA and NIST’s reports are criticized; Gage highlights instances of their findings being incomplete or inaccurate, particularly in the explanation of fires causing the collapses.
6. Evidence of Explosives: Gage presents evidence pointing to pre-placed explosives in WTC 7, such as molten steel and sulfur residues suggesting Thermite use, an incendiary material capable of producing extremely high temperatures.
7. Heat Analysis: It’s argued that the fires could not have reached the temperatures needed to melt steel or cause the building’s concrete to pulverize.
8. Controlled Demolition Features: Gage lists features typical of controlled demolitions observed in the collapses, such as symmetrical and free-fall speed collapses.
9. Lack of Resistance: The speed of the collapses suggests a removal of resistance within the building structure, indicating simultaneous failure of multiple columns, further pointing to a controlled demolition.
10. Nano-Thermite: Gage discusses findings of nano-thermite in the dust, a highly sophisticated material used in military applications, indicating involvement beyond simple fires.
11. Eyewitness’ Ignored Accounts: Accounts of explosions from first responders and other witnesses were largely ignored or omitted from official reports by FEMA and NIST.
12. Documentary Evidence: Multiple documentaries and studies, including the University of Alaska’s study, have been made to further investigate the alternative theories regarding the collapses.
13. WTC 7 and Peripheral Damage: Discussion includes a look at WTC 7’s structural features and lack of significant hits or damage compelling enough to cause its collapse based on fires alone.
14. Unexplained Molten Metal: Evidence of molten metal was found in the debris, which thermite could account for, but simple office fires could not.
15. Lateral Ejections: Detailed observations of lateral ejections, sometimes reaching up to 80 miles an hour, are noted as clear signs of explosive power.
16. High-Level Material: Gage notes the use of extremely advanced materials, suggesting deep and high-level involvement, possibly within defense contract circles.
17. Insurance Profits: The financial gains by building owner Larry Silverstein through insurance claims create a suspect narrative around his potential motivations.
18. Collapse Comparisons: Comparisons to previous building collapses, like in earthquakes, show stark differences between those and the controlled demolition style seen on 9/11.
19. Post-Collapse Debris: Examination of debris fields shows key indicators of controlled demolitions, unevenly spread structural steel, and minimal large concrete pieces.
20. Blast Patterns: Analyzes the blast patterns and sees horizontal ejections, which are inconsistent with the gravitational collapse scenario.
21. Thermal Image Analysis: Many photographs showed thermal imagery revealing much higher temperature zones than what office fires would produce.
22. Explosions During Broadcast: Various media broadcasts during the collapse day picked up sounds and shockwaves, again pointing towards explosions and not fire-induced collapses.
23. Fireproofing Discussions: The structural integrity maintained by fireproofing and design of WTC buildings should not have failed if solely attacked by fire.
24. Alleged Government Concealment: The implication that there’s a concerted effort to suppress this evidence or distract from it among official narratives and official inquiries.
25. Global Audience Appeal: The interview emphasizes the importance of spreading this critical reevaluation of the 9/11 events globally, encouraging reevaluation and new investigations.