Ann Vandersteel Broadcasts Powerful 9/11 Truth Series to a Vast Audience!
“Welcome to our series of deep dives into 9/11. In this episode Mr. Gage reveals the evidence and eyewitness testimony of extreme heat, completely unaccountable in the official narrative of the destruction of the Twin Towers.”
Watch it Now – with millions of others.
Here are some of the questions answered in this interview:
Why are there so many examples of temperatures exceeding 2,800 degrees F that normal office fires, and even jet fuel, cannot even remotely approach. Why are structural steel framing sections bent like noodles – with no cracks? Why are first responders witnessing the “ends of the beams dripping with molten steel” like “lava from a volcano”?
What does it mean that the WTC Structural Engineer saw a “river of molten steel”? And why is there abundant forensic analyses by experts of the WTC steel, i.e., in place as sculptures around the world, indicating evidence of the thick molten iron slag associated only with thermitic reactions?
What is the source of the “severe high-temperature corrosion [sulfur] attack on the steel” with a “liquid eutectic mixture [of] iron” documented by FEMA’s metallurgical examination of the structural steel in Appendix C of their report?
What about the analysis of the WTC dust by the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group which documents “previously molten iron microspheres,” about 4 tons worth, that they can’t or won’t determine the source of? How did these particles, almost naked to the human eye, become spherically shaped? And made of elemental iron? How did they come to be molten?
What mysteries of the WTC dust were documented in the 2009 peer-reviewed paper by yet another group of top scientists? Why were small chips of “nanothermite” found in all of their WTC dust samples?
Why didn’t NIST find and document all of this evidence? After all they were tasked by Congress with explaining in detail the destruction of the Twin Towers to the American People?
They didn’t – but, If you dare to investigate this for yourself, you’ll “see” it. Then you will have no choice but to come to grips with its dark implications.
Richard Gage, AIA is a 30-year architect, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder, and former CEO of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He is now independent along with his wife Gail – at RichardGage11 from which they continue to lead the effort toward a real investigation – reaching millions through their podcasts, speaking engagements and radio interviews.
RUMBLE https://rumble.com/c/c-1772035
GETTER https://gettr.com/user/annvandersteel
FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/ann.vandersteel
FRANK SPEECH https://frankspeech.com/shows/zelenko-report
RED VOICE MEDIA https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/zelenko-report/
FRANK SPEECH https://frankspeech.com/shows/zelenko-report
YOURNEWS.COM https://yournews.com/area/videos/
Thank you for your tireless work. I find it interesting when they show the plane crash site in Shanksville and the burn area seems to be very small but yet they want you to believe that when the plane crash into the towers that the jet fuel burns so intensely that it’s melted steel.
Richard, check out German physicist Heinz Pommer’s new nuclear demolition presentation – it might provide the explanation for the high temperatures:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-Px2y-EcCc
Richard you have to watch this new Heinz Pommer presentation with 5 prominent AE Truth people present. It explains the how question thoroughly and why the US geological radiation survey missed and omitted the radiation present (Heinz agrees incendiaries were used, but the main demolition effect came from the thermonuclear “eruptive egg” devices):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-Px2y-EcCc
… and … “New Mexicans for Science and Reason pointed out that very small metal particles have a much lower melting point than bulk material. Wires and filaments from electronics in the WTC are the likely source of the microspheres. The NMSR group even produced a YouTube video showing how to create your own microspheres by burning steel wool.”
I appreciate all you do!
We hope that this article will help with understanding the extreme heat and chemistry from the red/gray chips: https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/357-faq-7-aren-t-the-red-gray-chips-identified-in-the-wtc-dust-merely-primer-paint-from-the-wtc-steel-structural-elements
Are y’all aware of the counter-claims, that those red/gray chips found in the dust might be “kaolin clay pigments”, and that those (steel?) microspheres could have been formed at lower temperatures, as demonstrated in a youtube video? I still think the overwhelming evidence points to demolition, but these points should be addressed.
“The microscopy consulting firm MVA Scientific Consultants in Duluth, Ga. released a study of [those red-gray] chips collected from WTC dust… There was no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.”
Also, this series of videos from a 2009 UC Davis lecture by Dr. Steven Jones should be helpful: https://youtu.be/sZL89OgRBIw