with Jon Cole, Civil Engineer – our guest on RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! [1PM Sunday Feb 5]
Welcome back to our video podcast RichardGage911:UNLEASHED! We have a very special guest today – and engineer who focuses in the actual motion of the Twin Towers. He makes it soooo clear as to what’s actually happening to the Towers that a seventh grader can see through the official narrative of the “collapses.” DO NOT MISS this one.
- What was the first motion observed with the fall of tower one?
- How many theories were proposed over the years to explain the twin towers collapse?
- What is the official collapse theory for the twin towers collapse?
- Did the upper part of the twin towers speed up or slow down as they hit the lower undamaged floors and what is the significance?
- How long did it take for WTC 1 to completely fall to the ground?
- Why couldn’t we see the inner core columns fall clearly?
- How could the remaining “spire” of WTC 1 survive the massive pile driver above? How could it have move diagonally down?
- What is the most critical step when using the scientific method?
- There were two fundamental motions during the towers fall, namely down and out. Which motion came first and can it be demonstrated experimentally?
- Of all the theories proposed, which of the theories can be demonstrated experimentally and matches the most observed video and forensic evidence?
Gail and I are back now, after an extended absence from our exciting podcasts. We had to focus on the filming of Phase I – WTC 7 for our new film series 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom. You can still co-produce Phase 2!
Our podcasts are moving to Sunday afternoons at 12pm Pacific from here forward – so mark your calendars in advance!
We hope you enjoy our new high-tech edgy video entry bumper. Let us know in the comments!
It’s terrible when people can’t come up with exact explanations as to why the WTC towers collapsed when all they have to do is say ‘It was explosives’. This gets around any of this technical stuff about building structures and stability and structural failure and you can just say ‘it was explosives’. I am going to suggest that every time something collapses like a bridge for instance they just forget about any of this investigation stuff and just say ‘it was explosives’. It will work every time. Maybe Jonathan Cole could be put in charge of investigations of that kind and save everyone years of conjecture and study. Then of course the only thing to do would be to get people ‘in the Government’ and try them and imprison them, if not execute them. Job done. Maybe it could be called ‘The Committee for Public Safety’.